few days ago i was reading a validation report that started "How To Repeat the Error". we are so used to the often quoted dogma "never repeat the same mistake twice". but in the world of Reliability engineering, repeatability of experiments is a mantra. an experiment should be designed in such a way that it should produce the same result consistently when repeated multiple times under the same conditions. be it PASS or FAIL, correct or wrong, the result has to be consistent and stable. else, the design of the experiment is questionable. the assumptions involved in designing the experiment requires careful analysis and in the worst case, the validity of the experiment does not hold its ground at all.
all said, there is one question that has been bothering me since i had encountered it. when you transfer a semiconductor manufacturing process from one fab to another, with all the process parameters and fab set up maintained at the same values (meaning everything DITTOed), won't we be able to produce an exactly similar piece of silicon? i was told NO. but i think, YES.
all said, there is one question that has been bothering me since i had encountered it. when you transfer a semiconductor manufacturing process from one fab to another, with all the process parameters and fab set up maintained at the same values (meaning everything DITTOed), won't we be able to produce an exactly similar piece of silicon? i was told NO. but i think, YES.